A mediation platform decides which demand source gets a chance to fill each ad opportunity. That choice affects revenue, latency, reporting and the amount of operating work your team inherits.
There is no universal winner. A casual game with rewarded ads, a utility app with banners and a publisher with direct demand need different things.
This comparison focuses on seven active options and the teams they fit best.
Quick comparison
| Platform | Best fit | Bidding and waterfall | Main strength | Main watchout |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google AdMob | Small to mid-sized apps in Google’s stack | Yes | Fast start and Google demand | Reporting and control may feel limited for complex teams |
| AppLovin MAX | Mobile game publishers | Yes | Broad game demand and mature operations | Requires careful setup and ongoing analysis |
| Unity LevelPlay | Unity-heavy game teams | Yes | Game-focused mediation and Unity tooling | Product changes and packaging should be rechecked |
| DT FairBid | Publishers seeking an independent alternative | Yes | FairBid and DT Exchange integration | Smaller mindshare than the top three |
| Appodeal | Teams wanting managed monetization features | Yes | Mediation plus analytics and growth tools | Broad suite can exceed a simple team’s needs |
| CAS.AI | Small teams wanting managed setup | Yes | One-SDK approach and hands-on optimization | Verify network coverage for your traffic mix |
| Yandex Mediation | Apps strong in Yandex-served markets | Yes | Regional demand and free mediation | Less suitable as the default for every global portfolio |
Capabilities change. Recheck network support, pricing, SDK requirements and account eligibility before migrating.
1. Google AdMob
Google AdMob is the practical starting point for many Android and cross-platform apps. It combines Google’s own demand with third-party bidding and waterfall integrations.
Google’s documentation says AdMob Mediation can serve ads from multiple sources and supports bidding plus waterfall configurations. It also exposes impression-level revenue and an API for managing mediation groups. See the official mediation guide.
Best for: Teams already using Firebase, Google Analytics or Google Ads.
Choose it when:
- You need a familiar setup with strong Google demand.
- Your team wants clear SDK documentation.
- Firebase integration matters.
- You are starting with a small number of placements.
Check before choosing: API access, reporting granularity, supported bidding partners and any limits on the mediation controls your team wants to automate.
2. AppLovin MAX
AppLovin MAX is widely used by mobile game publishers. It supports bidding, waterfall demand, A/B testing, impression-level revenue and ad-quality workflows.
MAX offers aggregated revenue reporting plus user-level and impression-level revenue APIs. AppLovin recommends its own reporting API for daily operations because network reports can differ in time zone or delay. Review the official MAX reporting API overview.
Best for: Game portfolios with rewarded and interstitial inventory.
Choose it when:
- Gaming demand is central to your revenue.
- You need placement-level reporting.
- Your operators already understand MAX.
- Ad review and testing tools matter.
Check before choosing: Adapter maintenance, partner account requirements and the amount of manual operating work your portfolio will need.
For the rest of the stack, see nine tools that make MAX operations better.
3. Unity LevelPlay
Unity LevelPlay is designed around mobile game monetization. Its strongest fit is a game team that values Unity’s mediation, ad quality and growth products in one vendor relationship.
Unity lists adapters for AppLovin, Google AdMob, DT Exchange, Unity Ads and other sources across banner, interstitial and rewarded formats. The official supported-network table is the right place to check current versions.
Best for: Unity-based studios and game publishers.
Choose it when:
- Your app is built in Unity.
- You need game-oriented ad formats and reporting.
- Unity Ads is an important demand source.
- Your team wants integrated ad-quality tooling.
Check before choosing: Required packages, supported bidding relationships and migration work from an existing mediator.
4. DT FairBid
DT FairBid is Digital Turbine’s mediation product. It is a credible option for publishers that want bidding and waterfall control outside Google, AppLovin or Unity.
Its fit depends heavily on partner coverage and support in your core countries. Confirm that your highest-value networks and formats are available before planning a migration.
Best for: Established publishers comparing an independent mediation route.
Choose it when:
- DT Exchange is relevant to your demand mix.
- You want another enterprise mediation option.
- You have enough traffic to test a mediator properly.
Check before choosing: Adapter support, reporting exports, service terms and regional demand.
5. Appodeal
Appodeal combines mediation with analytics, user acquisition and growth tooling. It can reduce vendor sprawl for a team that wants a broader managed platform.
The trade-off is scope. A publisher that only needs mediation may prefer a narrower product and assemble analytics separately.
Best for: Small and mid-sized app teams seeking an integrated monetization service.
Choose it when:
- A single SDK and broader service suite are attractive.
- Your team wants monetization support.
- You prefer a managed operating model.
Check before choosing: Data export, contract terms, supported networks and how much configuration control remains with the publisher.
6. CAS.AI
CAS.AI targets publishers that want a simpler mediation setup and managed optimization. Its one-SDK pitch can be useful for lean teams that do not want to maintain a large collection of adapters themselves.
Simplicity should be tested against control. Ask how revenue data is exported, which demand sources are supported in your top countries and how easily the setup can be changed or removed.
Best for: Indie developers and small teams with limited ad operations time.
Choose it when:
- Integration effort is a primary concern.
- You want hands-on monetization support.
- Your traffic is concentrated in supported markets.
Check before choosing: SDK footprint, payment terms, network transparency and migration path.
7. Yandex Mediation
Yandex Mediation is a free platform that connects multiple demand sources and is especially relevant where Yandex Advertising Network demand is strong.
Yandex also publishes instructions for using its demand through AppLovin, AdMob and LevelPlay. That gives publishers the option to use Yandex as a demand source without making it the primary mediator. See Yandex’s third-party mediation guide.
Best for: Apps with meaningful traffic in Yandex-supported markets.
Choose it when:
- Yandex demand is commercially important.
- Your regional strategy justifies a dedicated setup.
- You need a free mediation option.
Check before choosing: Country coverage, payment access, policy requirements and third-party network support.
How to choose
Use a weighted scorecard rather than choosing the platform with the loudest case study.
| Criterion | Suggested weight |
|---|---|
| Demand strength in top countries | 25% |
| Supported formats and bidders | 20% |
| Reporting and impression-level data | 15% |
| SDK stability and latency | 15% |
| Experiment and control features | 10% |
| Support quality | 10% |
| Commercial terms | 5% |
Run the same inventory definitions through each candidate. Compare total revenue per request, show rate, latency and user outcomes. A higher dashboard eCPM can coexist with lower total revenue.
Mediation is one layer
The mediator runs ad delivery and auctions. It does not fully manage revenue operations, product guardrails or causal measurement.
UndrAds can sit above supported mediation data to monitor performance and manage bounded decisions. Read whether AI AdOps replaces mediation before planning the stack.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best ad mediation platform for mobile games?
AppLovin MAX and Unity LevelPlay are common game-focused choices. AdMob is also strong, especially for teams already using Google’s stack. Test with your formats and countries.
Should a publisher use more than one mediator?
Usually one mediator should control a given ad request path. Large publishers may use different mediators across apps or test groups, but overlapping SDK control can create complexity.
Does mediation increase ad revenue?
It can increase demand competition and fill. The result depends on integration quality, network mix, traffic, formats and ongoing operations.
Can UndrAds replace MAX, AdMob or LevelPlay?
No. UndrAds is an AdOps layer. A mediation platform still handles the auction, SDK and ad delivery.



