The perception of offerwalls is still catching up to what they actually are. A lot of publishers still picture the cluttered, aggressive reward walls from the early days of mobile gaming. The ones that buried users in irrelevant offers and killed session quality. That version of an offerwall was a problem.

The current version is a different product entirely.

Modern offerwalls are opt-in, structured, and performance-driven. Users see a curated list of tasks (installing an app, completing a survey, reaching a game milestone, signing up for a service) and choose what they want to engage with. They get a reward. The publisher earns revenue. The advertiser pays only for verified actions, not impressions. No one is forced into anything.

That value exchange is why offerwalls have moved from experimental to essential in many app monetization stacks, particularly in mobile gaming. If your users are not paying directly, offerwalls are one of the cleanest ways to generate revenue from that segment without wrecking the experience for everyone else.

Choosing the right network matters, though. The difference between a well-implemented offerwall and a poorly chosen one shows up in user complaints, support tickets, and churn. Not just revenue numbers.

This guide breaks down the top offerwall networks operating, what they’re genuinely good at, and what to watch for before signing up.

What offerwall ads actually are

An offerwall is an in-app or on-site placement that presents users with a list of tasks they can optionally complete in exchange for a reward, typically in-app currency, premium features, or loyalty points. The publisher earns a share of the revenue each time a user completes an offer.

Common offer types include:

App installs with post-install engagement requirements (CPI / CPE)
Market research surveys (CPL / CPS)
Service signups or free trial activations
Reaching specific milestones in a game (levels, playtime, achievements)
Video watching for micro-rewards

The format works best when the reward feels meaningful relative to the effort required, and when the offers are relevant enough that users don’t feel like they’re being asked to do random tasks to earn something they actually want.

For a deeper look at the format itself, see our guide on what offerwall ads are and how they work.

What makes a good offerwall network

Before getting into the list, these are the things worth evaluating with any network:

Offer quality and relevance. A large offer catalogue means nothing if the offers are low-quality or irrelevant to your users. Ask about vertical coverage, advertiser quality controls, and how they handle offer fatigue.

Fraud prevention. Invalid completions hurt advertisers, which eventually reduces demand and CPMs for publishers. Good networks have active fraud detection, not just on the advertiser side, but protecting publishers from chargebacks too.

Reward tracking reliability. This is where user trust lives or dies. If users complete offers and don’t receive their rewards, they complain, churn, and leave reviews. Ask networks directly about their tracking architecture and what happens when disputes arise.

Publisher support. Offerwalls generate support tickets. Users will have questions about missing rewards, declined offers, and payout timing. Networks that handle user-side support reduce your operational burden significantly.

Integration options. SDK, API, iframe, webview: different integration paths suit different setups. SDK-free options are increasingly popular because they reduce app size and update dependency.

Payment terms. Net-30 is standard. Some networks run net-60 or net-90. Minimum payout thresholds vary widely. Understand the payment cycle before you build revenue projections around it.

Top offerwall ad networks in 2026

1. UndrAds

UndrAds approaches monetization as a product problem rather than a placement problem. Rather than simply plugging in an offerwall and letting it run, the platform uses AI-driven optimization to match offer presentation with user context, considering session behavior, engagement signals, and timing to surface offers when users are most likely to complete them and least likely to be disrupted by them.

The focus on user experience alongside revenue is what separates it from networks that optimize purely for short-term fill. Pre-bid integrations keep latency low, and the platform’s autonomous ad ops approach means it adjusts continuously rather than requiring manual tuning.

Strong fit for publishers who care about long-term retention as much as immediate revenue. Particularly relevant if you’re running a mixed monetization model combining in-app advertising with IAP and need the offerwall to complement rather than compete with your other revenue streams.

Best for: App and web publishers who want controlled, experience-aware monetization with strong analytics.

Pricing: Custom CPM / revenue share

Integration: SDK, API, pre-bid compatible

2. Tapjoy (Unity)

Tapjoy, now part of Unity’s monetization stack, is one of the most recognized offerwall networks in mobile gaming. It runs an in-app rewarded marketplace built around opt-in virtual currency exchanges. Users complete tasks to earn in-game currency, and publishers earn revenue on each verified action.

Tapjoy’s main advantage is scale. It has over a billion monthly active users across its network and deep integration with Unity’s development and monetization tools, which makes it a natural fit if you’re already on the Unity stack. Their demand coverage is strong across the US and major gaming markets, and their currency sale promotions (limited-time boosted reward offers) can drive meaningful revenue spikes around key events.

The trade-off is complexity. Tapjoy works best when someone is actively managing placements, monitoring offer quality, and staying on top of user feedback. There’s a history of user complaints around reward crediting and support response times. This is not unique to Tapjoy, but worth flagging given their scale. Publishers who do well with Tapjoy typically have a clear internal support flow and communicate proactively with users about how offers work.

Best for: High-traffic mobile gaming apps, especially those already in the Unity ecosystem. Strong for global demand and volume-driven revenue.

Pricing: Revenue share (publishers typically keep 50-70% depending on deal structure)

Integration: SDK (iOS and Android), Unity plugin

3. Adjoe

Adjoe is one of the most interesting networks in this space right now. Their flagship product, Playtime, rewards users for time spent in apps rather than just for installs. This addresses one of the core problems with standard CPI offerwalls: users install an app, claim the reward, and immediately uninstall. Playtime ties rewards to ongoing engagement, which benefits advertisers, improves completion quality, and reduces the reward abuse that plagues install-only models.

The results are notable. Adjoe ranked as the top rewarded ad network globally in the AppsFlyer Performance Index for several consecutive periods, and their data shows 85% of rewarded users continued using core app features after engaging with their offerwall. They also drove 300,000+ daily active users accessing their Playtime offerwall through a single publisher integration.

For publishers, this translates to a more premium demand pool. Advertisers are willing to pay more for users who actually stay, and publishers see better ARPDAU compared to networks focused on volume over quality.

Best for: Mobile gaming publishers who want higher-quality engagement over raw install volume. Strong fit if user LTV matters to you as much as fill rate.

Pricing: Revenue share, custom deals

Integration: SDK (iOS and Android)

4. AppsPrize

AppsPrize is a task-based offerwall and rewarded engagement network built around multi-level reward structures. Rather than a single offer completion, their system allows publishers to set up milestone-based campaigns where rewards increase as users complete deeper in-app actions or reach specific progression points.

This is particularly relevant for games that rely on retention loops. A user who completes an offer to reach level 5 in a partner game has invested real time. That’s a much higher-intent action than a simple install. AppsPrize also has a Playtime SDK similar to Adjoe’s, which pays users for time spent in apps, giving publishers two complementary engagement models in one network.

They operate across 60+ countries with a broad global offer catalogue and both web and in-app integration options.

Best for: Games and apps that want deeper engagement beyond installs, particularly in markets outside the US where some larger networks have thinner demand.

Pricing: Revenue share

Integration: SDK, JavaScript, webview

5. RevU

RevU has built a strong reputation specifically around publisher-friendly offerwall integration. The standout feature is their SDK-free architecture. The offerwall runs via iframe, hosted solution, or whitelabel API rather than requiring an SDK in your app. For smaller teams or publishers who are cautious about SDK bloat and update maintenance, this is a meaningful practical advantage.

RevU handles user support in-house. Their dedicated support team manages missing reward claims, offer disputes, and crediting questions directly, which is a significant operational benefit for publishers who don’t want to build an internal support function around their offerwall.

Their advertiser catalogue spans surveys, app installs, service signups, and game milestones across CPI, CPA, and CPE models. Payout reporting is real-time and they publish transparent payment terms with no hidden fees.

Best for: Publishers of all sizes who want a clean SDK-free integration with strong user support infrastructure and transparent reporting.

Pricing: Revenue share, CPA-based

Integration: Iframe, hosted solution, whitelabel API (no SDK required)

6. Adscend Media

Adscend Media focuses on high-volume monetization for publishers with large non-paying user bases. Their offerwall covers app installs, market research surveys, video completions, game milestones, service signups, and free trial activations across 180+ countries, making it one of the broadest-coverage networks on this list.

The sheer breadth of their offer catalogue means there’s usually something relevant for most user types and geographies, which helps fill rates across internationally distributed traffic.

Publishers running high volumes tend to report stable results; smaller publishers or those who haven’t set up clear user support flows have had mixed experiences. Offer quality monitoring on your end is essential. Adscend gives you the volume, but you need to watch what actually runs.

Best for: Platforms monetizing non-paying users at scale, particularly with global or multi-region traffic where thinner networks leave gaps.

Pricing: Revenue share

Integration: Webview, SDK, API

7. AdGem

AdGem is a gaming-focused offerwall built around in-game reward mechanics: campaigns tied to achievements, level completions, time-based milestones, and progression events rather than generic app installs. This alignment with actual gameplay makes the offers feel less like interruptions and more like natural extensions of the game economy.

For free-to-play studios, this distinction matters. Generic CPI offers generate installs that often disappear. Gameplay-aligned rewards attract users who are already in a gaming mindset and are more likely to engage beyond the initial action. AdGem’s model is oriented toward extending LTV rather than maximizing install volume.

Integration via SDK and API, with analytics that let you track user progression through offer completion stages.

Best for: F2P game studios that want offerwall revenue without disrupting the game economy or pushing users toward offers that feel out of place.

Pricing: Revenue share, CPE-based

Integration: SDK, API

8. Torox

Torox is a global monetization network with separate offerwall products for web and mobile. The web-based offerwall covers for browser traffic and a mobile SDK for iOS and Android. That dual-surface coverage makes it useful for publishers who run both a website and an app and want a single network managing offerwall monetization across both.

Their international coverage is a genuine strength. Torox has solid offer availability across non-Tier-1 markets where some larger networks have thinner demand, making it a practical option for publishers with significant traffic from Southeast Asia, Latin America, or Eastern Europe.

API-based integration is also available for teams that want more control over the front-end presentation. Like most networks in this segment, user experiences with reward tracking and support are variable, so clear communication with your users about how offers work and what to do if something goes wrong is important.

Best for: Publishers with global or mixed traffic who need both web and app offerwall coverage from a single partner.

Pricing: Revenue share

Integration: Web offerwall, mobile SDK (iOS and Android), API

Comparison at a glance

Network	Best For	Offer Types	Integration	SDK-Free Option
UndrAds	Experience-aware monetization	Mixed	SDK, API, pre-bid	Yes
Tapjoy	High-traffic gaming, Unity ecosystem	CPI CPE Video	SDK, Unity plugin	No
Adjoe	Quality engagement, LTV-focused	Playtime CPE CPI	SDK	No
AppsPrize	Milestone-based engagement	CPI CPE Playtime	SDK, JS, webview	Partial
RevU	SDK-free, strong user support	CPA CPI Surveys	Iframe, API, hosted	Yes
Adscend Media	High-volume, global traffic	CPI Surveys Video Trials	SDK, webview, API	No
AdGem	F2P games, gameplay-aligned rewards	CPE CPI Milestones	SDK, API	No
Torox	Web + app, non-Tier-1 markets	Mixed	Web, SDK, API	Partial

How to pick the right one

You’re a gaming studio prioritizing user quality over volume: Start with Adjoe or AdGem. Both are designed around engagement depth rather than install counts, which produces better advertiser demand and less churn from users who complete one offer and disappear.

You’re already on Unity: Tapjoy is the obvious first test. The ecosystem integration reduces setup friction significantly.

You want minimal dev overhead: RevU’s SDK-free architecture is the lowest-friction path to a live offerwall. Useful if your team is small or if you’re testing the format before committing to a full SDK integration.

You have global or mixed traffic: Torox and Adscend have the broadest non-Tier-1 coverage. Adscend for volume, Torox if you want a single partner across web and app.

You want the offerwall to fit into a broader monetization strategy rather than operate in isolation: UndrAds is built for that. If you’re running in-app bidding, direct deals, and an offerwall alongside each other, having a platform that manages the interaction between revenue streams rather than treating each one independently is worth the consideration.

Most publishers who run offerwalls seriously test at least two networks before settling. CPMs, fill rates, and user experience vary more by audience than by network reputation. What works well for one app may not work at all for another. Budget time for a proper A/B test before making a long-term commitment.

Related reading

Want to see how UndrAds fits into your current monetization stack? Talk to the team.

Top 9 Offerwall Ad Networks: Who’s Actually Worth Your Traffic?

Rashmita Behera